Thursday, May 10, 2007

There's The Evidence

David Iglesias, the fired U.S. attorney from New Mexico, told the Seattle Times this yesterday about who he thinks might be behind the Prosecutor Purge:

"It's hard for us to know who in the White House said what, on what date. The people that would have a voice in this would be Karl Rove, [Rove aide] Scott Jennings, [former White House counsel] Harriet Miers, probably, yes," he said. "But it's hard for me to say 'yes,' [without] looking at those e-mails and memos that are probably out there and missing that this is what they said on this date about John and me and my colleagues. But that would explain why the wagons are so tightly circled," Iglesias added.

Murray Waas reports in the National Journal that some of those emails and memos are not only NOT missing (as the White House has previously said) but that they actually show WHO was behind at least one of those prosecutor firings:

The Bush administration has withheld a series of e-mails from Congress showing that senior White House and Justice Department officials worked together to conceal the role of Karl Rove in installing Timothy Griffin, a protégé of Rove's, as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

The withheld records show that D. Kyle Sampson, who was then-chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, consulted with White House officials in drafting two letters to Congress that appear to have misrepresented the circumstances of Griffin's appointment as U.S. attorney and of Rove's role in supporting Griffin.

In one of the letters that Sampson drafted, dated February 23, 2007, the Justice Department told four Senate Democrats it was not aware of any role played by senior White House adviser Rove in attempting to name Griffin to the U.S. attorney post. A month later, the Justice Department apologized in writing to the Senate Democrats for the earlier letter, saying it had been inaccurate in denying that Rove had played a role.

Brad Berenson, an attorney for Sampson, said in an interview that his client did not intend to mislead Congress. Sampson, he said, signed off on the February 23 letter based on representations made by the White House that it was accurate.

The withheld e-mails show that Sampson's draft was forwarded for review to Chris Oprison, an associate White House counsel, who approved the language saying that Justice was not aware of Rove having played any role in supporting Griffin. But an earlier e-mail from Sampson to Oprison that has already been made public indicates that the two men discussed Rove and then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers as being at the forefront of Griffin's nomination.

Several of the e-mails that the Bush administration is withholding from Congress, as well as papers from the White House counsel's office describing other withheld documents, were made available to National Journal by a senior executive branch official, who said that the administration has inappropriately kept many of them from Congress.

The senior official said that Gonzales, in preparing for testimony before Congress, has personally reviewed the withheld records and has a responsibility to make public any information he has about efforts by his former chief of staff, other department aides, and White House officials to conceal Rove's role.

"If [Gonzales] didn't know everything that was going on when it went down, that is one thing," this official said. "But he knows and understands chapter and verse. If there was an effort within Justice and the White House to mislead Congress, it is his duty to disclose that to Congress. As the country's chief law enforcement official, he has a higher duty to disclose than to protect himself or the administration."

The administration's executive privilege argument is getting sillier and sillier as we learn more about who did what in these matters.

And notice, we ARE learning more and more about the scandal even as the White House is trying to stonewall the Congressional investigations and the press.

Stonewalling only works when everybody is helping to build the wall.

That ain't happening anymore.

As the rats continue to jump ship and tell tales about each other, we'll continue to learn more about the scandal.

Let's see where it takes us.

Former Gonzo aide and DOJ/WH liaison Monica Goodling will be the next to testify now that she's been given limited immunity.

That ought to be interesting.

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?