Sunday, July 16, 2006

Gingrich Says We're In WWIII, GOP Should Use This Against Dems in The Midterms

Ratcheting up the partisan rhetoric, Newt Gingrich says the GOP needs to tell voters that world is in the middle of World War III and only Republicans can keep them safe in this global conflict:

Gingrich said in the coming days he plans to speak out publicly, and to the Administration, about the need to recognize that America is in World War III.

He lists wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, this week's bomb attacks in India, North Korean nuclear threats, terrorist arrests and investigations in Florida, Canada and Britain, and violence in Israel and Lebanon as evidence of World War III. He said Bush needs to deliver a speech to Congress and "connect all the dots" for Americans.

He said the reluctance to put those pieces together and see one global conflict is hurting America's interests. He said people, including some in the Bush Administration, who urge a restrained response from Israel are wrong "because they haven't crossed the bridge of realizing this is a war."

"This is World War III," Gingrich said. And once that's accepted, he said calls for restraint would fall away:

"Israel wouldn't leave southern Lebanon as long as there was a single missile there. I would go in and clean them all out and I would announce that any Iranian airplane trying to bring missiles to re-supply them would be shot down. This idea that we have this one-sided war where the other team gets to plan how to kill us and we get to talk, is nuts."

There is a public relations value, too. Gingrich said that public opinion can change "the minute you use the language" of World War III. The message then, he said, is "'OK, if we're in the third world war, which side do you think should win?"

Gingrich doesn't mention how many of the problems the U.S. is facing in "WWIII" are self-inflicted. Preznit Bush and the ruling Grand Old Party have managed to take the empathy that much of the world felt for the United States after 9/11 and squander it by invading Iraq and pursuing policies of torture and kidnapping in the war on terror, thus radicalizng millions of Muslims against the United States and the Western world in the process. The "terrorists" arrested in Miami and Toronto have said the Iraq war was the main reason they wanted to blow up targets in Canada and the United States. The terrorists responsible for the Madrid and London bombings also claimed the Iraq war as motivation for the horrific attacks that killed innocent civilians in Spain and Britain.

In addition, North Korea and Iran have both been emboldened by the Bush administration's failed Iraq occupation. Knowing that the American military is stretched to the breaking point, neither North Korea nor Iran seem to fear the consequences of their aggressive actions. Iran in particular seems carefree as it arms Shiite militamen in Iraq, encourages Hezbollah and Hamas to act aggressively against Israel, and pursues a nuclear weapons program. And North Korea said yesterday it plans to test more missile in the very near future.

So if Gingrich wants some dots connected, then Democrats should connect the dots of all the foreign policy failures the administration has suffered and note how they have brought the United States to its weakest point since the Vietnam pull-out. The administration is impotent to deal with the problems facing the nation and the world. The administration's vaunted arrogance, simplistic views of the world and belief that it can "make its own reality" have come back to haunt it as the complexities of the real world reveal the limitations of a foreign policy toolbelt containing only a hammer.

If Gingrich wants to scare Americans into voting for the GOP, then Democrats need to remind voters just how incompetent (Iraq, Katrina) dishonest (Iraq, CIA leak case) and corrupt (Halliburton, Abramoff, Delay) the administration and the ruling party are and ask voters if they've "Had enough?" yet.

Comments:
Uh, thanks for sharing.
 
well, it is funnier than Gingrich.
Fortunately he is so full of bullshit he can't even recognise WWIII
Yes, the dems do need to seize on this war lust. THey need to do it quickly, becuase if Newt gets his wish you can forget democracy.
 
Lose your boners guys, the dems are just as rotten as goppers.
 
Cartledge, didn't Gingrich and his fellow Repubs call the Cold War WWII? Wouldn't that make this WWIV? Just wondering...

romunov - you're not wrong to say the Dems are rotten...but as rotten as the repubs? Given the budget deficit, the economic recovery that benefited only the top 10%, the tax policy that benefited only the top 10%, the Iraq mess, the Katrina mess, and the state of American foreign policy today, I'd have to say that as bad as the Dems are, they'd be an improvement over what we have now.
 
romunov, but of course. And I do save my boners for more suitable pastimes.
But I wouold guess they will at least play the anti war game for now.

RBE, not realy sure, but I think you are right. There were wiser heads - my memory is failing me - who were more focused on the cold war hype.
I doubt the like of Gingerich had the same pull bach then.
Bloody hell I wish I could dredge up the names - must be getting old :(
 
William F Buckley was one I was trying to think of.
 
If Gingrich wants to scare Americans into voting for the GOP, then Democrats need to remind voters just how incompetent (Iraq, Katrina) dishonest (Iraq, CIA leak case) and corrupt (Halliburton, Abramoff, Delay) the administration and the ruling party are and ask voters if they've "Had enough?" yet.

Well, they were doing that...at least until the DCCC decided to yank the article. Spineless, worthless, timid, wastes of genetic material! We're doomed.
 
kvatch - yup - somebody on the blogs called the Dems invertebrates for pulling the ad about the war, that basically covers it. It's hard to beat an opponent when you're afraid to offend anybody.

That's not to say that anybody should be offended by showing the coffins of American soldiers killed in the Iraq war in a campaign ad. People need to be reminded that Americans are dying in this war and that if they reelect the Rubber Stamp Congress they're going to get a lot more of the same.

cartledge - I knew there was somrebody on the right who called the Cold war WWII. Buckley sounds like the guy. This would be the same William F. Buckley who called the Iraq war a dismal failure, btw.
 
This would be the same William F. Buckley who called the Iraq war a dismal failure, btw.
I could be way out my league here, but I think that was Jr.
The boy was a shawdow of dad, but a riveting cold war novlist.
He made dumb coments outside his major.
But feel free to correct me
 
Nope - it's the same guy. William F. Buckley Jr. is the man who wrote "God and Man at Yale," started the National Review and is considered the godfather of hte conservative movement, along w/ Barry Goldwater. Those Cold War novels you speak of revolved around a CIA agent named Blackford Oakes. They're tripe, kinda like Ian Fleming only w/ an anti-communist/anti-FDR gloss. The only spy novelist I could ever stomach was John Le Carre. I still think "The Spy Who Came In From The Cold" was both a brilliant novel and a brilliant film (w/ Richard Burton.)

I do wonder if Blackford Oakes ever met Valerie Plame though. Now there would be a fitting end to the series of novels, eh?
 
Yes I did read the garbage (some of it). I'll defer to you on this :)
I didn't really think he had the brain cells.

I've been thinking, where are the Harriman's and their ilk when you need them.
They were devious, but at least they were intellegent.
 
Buckley's schtick is to use SAT words with seven or eight syllables in them to talk ovee the heads of everybody else and show you how erudite he is. Frankly, it's tiresome after about a minute and a half.
 
Okay, but off topic, just to show I've still got it in a cricketless country:
England were left to rue a belated declaration and their weakened bowling attack as Pakistan secured a comfortable draw in the first Test
I predicted a draw you might recall. In cricket no result beats a loss anytime.
(I'm having a holiday from heartwrenching tragedy today.)

Oh, and I agree on Buckley, but it was my cold war period.
 
cartledge, I am a baseball fan. I used to be a football, hockey, and basketball fan as well, but I've lost interest in those sports. I've never been able to understand cricket. But I definietely see the connection to baseball. I will try and watch a little in the near future and see if I like it.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?